|
|
Many
contradictions of the modern age are attributable to the fact that
peoples and countries had entered it at different levels of
development. There was a ‘top league’ of the industrialized nations
of Europe and North America, which used their great industrial
muscle to spread their political and economic domination over a
considerable part of the globe. At the other end, there were
colonial countries, for which the contact with Western civilization
brought plundering of their natural resources and exploitation of
their populations. |
 |
There was also a third group of states, in Asia as well as in Europe,
which had their own centuries-old history, yet had emerged as actors in
the international scene relatively recently. Some countries of that
group were in the position of semi-colonies, other were themselves
colonial empires, yet all of them had one thing in common: they were
confronted with the historical challenge of closing the gap with the
developed nations. |
The
countries in that middle group had fallen behind in rates of
development for various reasons: Spain, because it had come to
depend too much on the exploitation of its vast colonies in Latin
America; Japan, due to its self-imposed isolation; Italy, because of
political fragmentation, etc. The main reason, however, was that
these states had been slow to modernize the traditional
socio-economic system inherited from the medieval era and had
preserved many of its characteristics. They now faced the task of
overcoming their backwardness by taking the path of capitalist
modernization and following the lead of the advanced industrialized
nations. Russia was one of these modernizing, developing states.
From the
times of Peter the Great, Russia has made several modernization
attempts seeking a radical restructuring and rejuvenation of all
essential spheres of the country’s life: from its economy to its
political system. However, the problem with all of Russia’s
modernizing efforts was that reforms were launched too late, when
the country was already in the grip of a social and political crisis
and when the government was under intense direct pressure either
from ‘below’ in the form of mass social discontent or from an
external threat or a military defeat. In such exceptional
circumstances and under such great pressure the reforming government
was compelled to act quickly and in great haste, often without
enough time to think through its new policies and their
consequences. As a result, none of the periodically undertaken
reforms was carried out in a comprehensive and consistent manner.
Each generation of reformers inherited unresolved problems from
previous reform efforts and passed on its own unresolved problems to
the next. Not only had every new generation of reformers to deal
with the backlog of accumulated past problems, but it had to draw up
a new reform plan for an empire which had expanded and grown in the
size of its territory and population and which consequently
required a restructuring on a bigger scale and of greater
complexity than before.
|
|
|
Tsarist Russia |
|
Images &
Video |


 |
|